Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 15:46

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What is the degree of influence of Saudi Wahhabism on the modern Muslim world?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Apple quietly makes running Linux containers easier on Macs - ZDNet
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Panthers' winning formula goes missing in Stanley Cup Final Game 1 loss to Oilers - NHL.com
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Jennie Garth 'Never Felt More Confident' as She Poses In First Underwear Photoshoot at 53 - TooFab
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why is casting white historical people black in movies wrong?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why was the rock band Kiss so successful?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.